@article{ref1,
title="Determining fixed glance duration for visual occlusion research",
journal="Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomic Society annual meeting",
year="2011",
author="Chen, Huei-Yen Winnie and Milgram, Paul",
volume="55",
number="1",
pages="1904-1908",
abstract="Little empirical evidence can be found in the visual occlusion literature to justify decisions about how glance durations should be fixed for self-paced visual occlusion investigations. This paper presents a hypothesis about how glance duration may affect performance, based on a theory of how uncertainty develops as an operator's vision is occluded and how it is resolved during visual glances. Data are analysed from two on-road driving experiments involving a range of fixed glance durations. The analysis is repeated with data collected from an analogous study in a low fidelity driving simulator. Both analyses support the hypothesis that increasing glance duration may prolong achievable mean occlusion times, but only up to a certain point, after which essentially no changes are expected. The paper concludes with a practical recommendation for selecting fixed glance durations for (self-paced) visual occlusion studies.<p /><p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="2169-5067",
doi="10.1177/1071181311551396",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1071181311551396"
}