@article{ref1,
title="Public support for political compromise on a volatile racial issue: insight from the survey experiment",
journal="Political psychology",
year="2006",
author="Glaser, James M.",
volume="27",
number="3",
pages="423-439",
abstract="In 2000, South Carolina officials, after years of political wrangling over the flying of the Confederate flag over the state capitol, finally removed it, placing it at a Confederate monument on the statehouse grounds. Here, via iterative survey experimentation, I look at the public response to the political compromise required to bring down the flag. I show that the public did respond positively to the multifaceted compromise and that black flag opponents were much more likely than white flag proponents to support the compromise. I also show that more white flag proponents can be swayed to support the compromise if they understand that it is supported by a majority of South Carolinians, thus breaking their misperception of the issue. Flag proponents, however, do not respond more positively to compromise simply because it is the by-product of white and black negotiations. The political process necessarily evokes competitive intergroup attitudes. Can we think about process in a way that redirects these attitudes and makes political compromise more acceptable?<p /><p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="0162-895X",
doi="10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00508.x",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00508.x"
}