@article{ref1,
title="Judgments about illegal performance enhancing substances: reasoned, reactive or both?",
journal="Journal of health psychology",
year="2013",
author="Dodge, Tonya and Stock, Michelle and Litt, Dana",
volume="18",
number="7",
pages="962-971",
abstract="This study applied aspects of the Theory of Reasoned Action and the Prototype/Willingness model to understand cognitions associated with the use of illegal performance-enhancing substances. There were two study objectives. One was to investigate whether the illegal-is-effective heuristic (i.e. belief that illegal performance-enhancing substances are more effective than legal performance-enhancing substances) affects willingness to use illegal performance-enhancing substances. The second was to examine whether attitudes, norms, and prototypes influence the willingness and intentions to use illegal performance-enhancing substances. The illegal-is-effective heuristic was a significant predictor of willingness but was not a significant predictor of intentions. Implications for future research and prevention efforts are discussed.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="1359-1053",
doi="10.1177/1359105312445079",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1359105312445079"
}