@article{ref1,
title="Avoiding misrepresentation in forensic human factors",
journal="Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomic Society annual meeting",
year="2009",
author="Nemire, Kenneth",
volume="53",
number="9",
pages="549-553",
abstract="Every aspect of human factors consulting in litigation presents opportunities and challenges for acting in an ethical manner. This article discusses three types of misrepresentation that pose ethical problems: (1) disregarding information, (2) misrepresenting existing research, and (3) misrepresenting facts in a case. These examples are demonstrated in the context of three different lawsuits involving forensic human factors experts. The article concludes with a discussion of the role of the forensic expert to help reveal the truth, and a suggestion to revise the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Code of Ethics.<p /><p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="2169-5067",
doi="10.1177/154193120905300902",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154193120905300902"
}