@article{ref1,
title="The paradox of auxiliary rights: The privilege against   self-incrimination and the right to keep and bear arms",
journal="Duke law journal",
year="2002",
author="Green, M. S.",
volume="52",
number="1",
pages="113-178",
abstract="According to Locke's theory, of the social contract, which was widely   accepted by the Founders, political authority, is limited by those   natural moral rights that individuals reserve against the government. In   this Article, I argue that Locke's theory generates paradoxical   conclusions concerning the government's authority over civil   disobedients, that is, people who resist the government because they   believe it is violating reserved moral rights. If the government lacks   the authority, to compel the civil disobedient to abide by its laws, the   result is anarchism: The limits on governmental authority are whatever   each individual says they are. If the government has this authority, the   result is authoritarianism: The limits on governmental authority are   whatever the government says they are. Both conclusions are   unacceptable.<p />",
language="",
issn="0012-7086",
doi="10.2307/1373133",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1373133"
}