@article{ref1,
title="MABA-MABA or Abracadabra? Progress on human-automation co-ordination",
journal="Cognition, technology and work",
year="2002",
author="Dekker, Sidney W. A. and Woods, David D.",
volume="4",
number="4",
pages="240-244",
abstract="In this paper we argue that substitution-based function allocation methods (such as MABA-MABA, or Men-Are-Better-At/Machines-Are-Better-At lists) cannot provide progress on human-automation co-ordination. Quantitative 'who does what' allocation does not work because the real effects of automation are qualitative: it transforms human practice and forces people to adapt their skills and routines. Rather than re-inventing or refining substitution-based methods, we propose that the more pressing question on human-automation co-ordination is 'How do we make them get along together?'<p /><p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="1435-5558",
doi="10.1007/s101110200022",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s101110200022"
}