
@article{ref1,
title="Friendship network characteristics and psychological well-being in late adolescence: exploring differences by gender and gender composition",
journal="Scandinavian journal of public health",
year="2014",
author="Almquist, Ylva B. and Ostberg, Viveca and Rostila, Mikael and Edling, Christofer and Rydgren, Jens",
volume="42",
number="2",
pages="146-154",
abstract="Aims: The aim of the present study was to examine the association between friendship networks and psychological well-being among 19-year-olds. METHODS: The data used was a random sample of Swedish individuals born in 1990 who answered a questionnaire in 2009-2010. Friendship networks were considered in terms of three measures of emotional support. Six statements about the individual's emotional state were used to create a summary measure of psychological well-being. Gender and gender composition were included as potentially moderating factors. The association between friendship networks and psychological well-being was analysed by means of linear regression analysis (n = 1289). RESULTS: The results indicate that males' and females' friendship networks were similar with regard to quality and trust, whereas males' networks were characterized by less self-disclosure and a stronger preference for same-gender friendships. Gender composition did not matter for the support levels. Emotional support was associated with psychological well-being but there were gender differences: females seemed to benefit more health-wise from having high-quality (and trusting) networks. Moreover, whereas self-disclosure among males was positively linked to well-being, this was not the case among females. None of these associations were moderated by gender composition. CONCLUSIONS: In sum, friendship networks are beneficial for the psychological well-being among late adolescents, but there are some important differences according to gender.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="1403-4948",
doi="10.1177/1403494813510793",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1403494813510793"
}