@article{ref1,
title="Methodological issues in defining aggression for content analyses of sexually explicit material",
journal="Archives of sexual behavior",
year="2014",
author="McKee, Alan",
volume="44",
number="1",
pages="81-87",
abstract="There exists an important tradition of content analyses of aggression in sexually explicit material. The majority of these analyses use a definition of aggression that excludes consent. This article identifies three problems with this approach. First, it does not distinguish between aggression and some positive acts. Second, it excludes a key element of healthy sexuality. Third, it can lead to heteronormative definitions of healthy sexuality. It would be better to use a definition of aggression such as Baron and Richardson's (1994) in our content analyses, that includes a consideration of consent. A number of difficulties have been identified with attending to consent but this article offers solutions to each of these.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="0004-0002",
doi="10.1007/s10508-013-0253-3",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0253-3"
}