@article{ref1,
title="Does running shoe midsole hardness influence running-related injuries? Results from a double blind randomized controlled trial",
journal="British journal of sports medicine",
year="2014",
author="Theisen, D. and Malisoux, L. and Delattre, N. and Seil, R. and Urhausen, A.",
volume="48",
number="7",
pages="664-664",
abstract="BACKGROUND: The shock absorption qualities of running shoes are thought to have an important influence on running-related injuries (RRIs). However, scientific evidence of this relationship is still lacking. OBJECTIVE: To test if midsole hardness of standard running shoes was related to RRIs. DESIGN: Double-blind randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Free-roaming leisure-time distance runners. PARTICIPANTS: Study participants were recruited through newspaper advertisements, posts on specialized internet sites and via mouth-to-ear. They were required to report any running activity, sport practice and injury using a dedicated internet platform. Recorded information was systematically verified, if necessary through direct contacts with the participants. RISK FACTOR ASSESSMENT: Leisure-time runners were provided with identical running shoes, except for their midsole hardness which was either hard (H; n=113) or soft (S; n=134). They were followed prospectively for 5 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome measure was exposure volume (hours) to running practice until first-time RRI (Cox proportional hazards regression analyses). RESULTS: Overall, 12.1 RRIs were recorded per 1000 hours of running. There was a 15% difference between the shoe types regarding midsole stiffness. The type of shoe used for running was not related to RRI (hazard ratio (HR)=0.92; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.57-1.48). Furthermore, no difference was detected regarding RRI patterns (location, severity, etc.). Significant risk factors for RRIs were body mass index (HR=1.13; 95% CI 1.03-1.23), injury in the 12 months preceding the study (HR=1.74; 95% CI 1.04-2.90) and average session intensity (HR=1.40; 95% CI 1.04-1.87). Previous regular running practice (HR=0.42; 95% CI 0.23-0.78) and volume of other sport activities (HR=0.70; 95% CI 0.56-0.88) were significant protective factors. CONCLUSIONS: RRI risk was not associated with running shoe midsole hardness in this study.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="0306-3674",
doi="10.1136/bjsports-2014-093494.279",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2014-093494.279"
}