
@article{ref1,
title="Biomechanico-clinical study of gunshot wounds (general problems--II)",
journal="Chirurgia Italiana",
year="1988",
author="Marini, F. and Tenchini, P. and Radin, S. and Manganelli, F. and Seifer, S.",
volume="40",
number="2",
pages="104-116",
abstract="Whenever the surgeon finds himself face to face with a wound (probably this is the only opportunity for a meeting between physician and pathology which seems to be able to leave the &quot;illness&quot; on one side, almost forgotten, as it were), even when immersed in routine, he can hardly help making a number of considerations of a general nature, to which the sentence above in brackets is not entirely extraneous. In practice, we cannot help asking ourselves an apparently simple, almost banal, question: what exactly is trauma? This triggers off a whole series of secondary queries, such as, for instance, what the relationship is between trauma and classical pathology? In the first place, it should be pointed out that &quot;traumatic&quot; pathology is undoubtedly the only instance of pathology in which, as a rule, at least at the outset, one can justifiably talk about the &quot;isolated&quot; role of what can certainly be regarded as an out-of-body factor. If, then, we consider the specifically morphological and pathophysiological aspects of the period subsequent to the traumatic insult, we find ourselves in an even more embarrassing position: we are faced with irreparably devastated organ and body structures, or with a situation which is already on the way to convalescence. One last alternative is that the traumatic insult is merely a memory, a key finding in the case history, a past reality which to all intent and purposes has ceased to exist, and we are faced with extremely complex clinical pictures which we tend to label as complications. A few examples by way of explanation: shock, adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), stress ulcer, acute post-traumatic cholecystitis, haemorrhagic pancreatitis, and problems caused by resolving the hypovolaemia-ischaemia situation and by implementing reperfusion (oxygen radicals). Trauma favours - and surgeons concerned with organ transplants are well aware of this - the only possibility of death which, perhaps with a grain of excessive optimism, we may even accept as fruitful, in that it occurs without all the destructive deterioration involved in the process of dying. The above consideration probably plays a major role in our attitudes of almost fatalistic resignation towards the youthful victims of trauma.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)<p /><p>Language: it</p>",
language="it",
issn="0009-4773",
doi="",
url="http://dx.doi.org/"
}