@article{ref1,
title="Brooding, reflection, and distraction: relation to non-suicidal self-injury versus suicide attempts",
journal="Archives of suicide research",
year="2014",
author="Polanco-Roman, Lillian and Jurska, Justyna and Quiñones, Victoria and Miranda, Regina",
volume="19",
number="3",
pages="350-365",
abstract="OBJECTIVEs. The present study examined the relation between cognitive response styles (i.e., brooding rumination, reflective rumination, distraction) and cognitive inflexibility in differentially predicting history of non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) only, suicide attempt (SA) only, or both (NSSI+SA). <br><br>METHODS. College students (N = 352) completed self-report measures of rumination, distraction, and self-harm history, a diagnostic interview, and a computerized task measuring cognitive flexibility. <br><br>RESULTS. Brooding rumination uniquely predicted SA-only history, while reflective rumination uniquely predicted history of NSSI-only and NSSI+SA. Distraction was associated with lower odds of NSSI-only and NSSI+SA. Cognitive inflexibility was not significantly associated with self-harm history. <br><br>CONCLUSION. Cognitive vulnerabilities may help identify individuals who are at risk for self-harm and may differentiate between NSSI and SA.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="1381-1118",
doi="10.1080/13811118.2014.981623",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2014.981623"
}