@article{ref1,
title="Counseling at a seizure clinic does not ensure disclosure to the transportation registry",
journal="Canadian journal of neurological sciences",
year="2015",
author="Siddiqi, Maria and Jirsch, Jeffrey",
volume="42",
number="4",
pages="230-234",
abstract="BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of current self-reporting driving laws for medically-unfit potential seizure patients is unknown in Canada. We designed a prospective cohort study of patients' self-reporting practices to the local Transportation Registry (TR) and their driving behaviors following detailed counselling at a seizure clinic in a discretionary physician-reporting jurisdiction. <br><br>METHODS: Medically unfit drivers, referred to our seizure clinic, who had a valid driver's permit at the time of their episode of impaired consciousness were included. Patients' self-reporting and driving behaviours were assessed using a standardized interview prior to a neurologist's counseling and later at a follow-up visit. <br><br>RESULTS: Sixty three patients were included; 77% were diagnosed as having had a seizure at the time of their referral. Prior to their seizure clinic visit, 3/63 (5%) had been counseled to self-report to the TR by a non-neurologist physician, and none had done so. Following a neurologist's documented counseling 34/63 (54%) had self-reported themselves at the follow-up seizure clinic visit, and 53/63 (84%) were not driving. <br><br>CONCLUSION: This prospective study design is the first in North America to examine self-reporting rates for unfit drivers with a seizure disorder. Our findings suggest that self-reporting laws do not ensure high rates of self-reporting behaviors even when patients seen at a seizure clinic are appropriately counseled of their legal obligations. The rate of driving cessation appears greater than the rate of self-reporting to the TR among counseled patients.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="0317-1671",
doi="10.1017/cjn.2015.41",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2015.41"
}