@article{ref1,
title="From criminogenic risk to rehabilitation: is there a need for a culturally sensitive approach?",
journal="International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology",
year="2015",
author="Stams, Geert Jan J. M.",
volume="59",
number="12",
pages="1263-1266",
abstract="<p>An important analytical framework in research on non-specific (i.e., common) factors that may contribute to successful prevention and treatment of delinquency is the risk- need-responsivity (RNR) model (Andrews et al., 1990). The risk principle states that the intensity of treatment should match the risk of (re)committing a criminal offense, the need principle states that dynamic (i.e., changeable) criminogenic risk factors should be assessed by agencies and targeted in treatment, and the responsivity principle states that treatment (cognitive-behavioral) should be fine-tailored to the learning style, motivation, abilities, and strengths of the (potential) offender (Andrews & Bonta, 2006). Andrews and Bonta (2010) provided empirical evidence showing that interventions that adhere to the RNR model can substantially reduce criminal offense recidivism.  Keywords: Juvenile justice </p> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="0306-624X",
doi="10.1177/0306624X15608829",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0306624X15608829"
}