@article{ref1,
title="Biofidelity evaluation of WorldSID and ES-2re under side impact conditions with and without airbag",
journal="Accident analysis and prevention",
year="2016",
author="Kim, Taewung and Shaw, Greg and Lessley, David J. and Park, Gwansik and Crandall, Jeffrey Richard and Svendsen, Andy and Whitcomb, Bryant and Ayyagari, Murthy and Mishra, Prashast and Markusic, Craig",
volume="90",
number="",
pages="140-151",
abstract="This study evaluated the biofidelity of the WorldSID and the ES-2re under whole-body side impact conditions with and without a side airbag using the biomechanical cadaveric response data generated from 4.3m/s whole-body side impact tests. Impact forces, spinal kinematics, and chest deflections were considered in the biofidelity evaluation. Average responses and response corridors of PMHS were created using a time-alignment technique to reduce variability of the PMHS responses while maintaining the sum of the time shifts to be zero for each response. Biofidelity of the two dummies was compared using a correlation and analysis (CORA) method. The WorldSID demonstrated better biofidelity than the ES-2re in terms of CORA ratings in the conditions with airbag (0.53 vs. 0.46) and without an airbag (0.57 vs. 0.49). Lastly, the kinematic analysis of the two dummies indicated an overly compliant shoulder response of the WorldSID and excessive forward rotation of the ES-2re relative to the PMHS.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="0001-4575",
doi="10.1016/j.aap.2016.02.010",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.02.010"
}