@article{ref1,
title="Examining intimate partner violence types in a diverse sample of court-referred parenting dyads",
journal="Journal of child custody",
year="2015",
author="Wray, Alisha M. and Hoyt, Tim and Gerstle, Melissa and Leitman, Beth",
volume="12",
number="3-4",
pages="248-272",
abstract="Typology systems hold promise to improve IPV treatment outcomes. Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart's (1994) typology was investigated using cluster analysis to categorize IPV behaviors among 112 partner-violent dyads. IPV types were compared on individual [convictions, physical assault, injury] and dyadic behaviors [symmetry, directionality, and co-occurrence of types]. As hypothesized, three-cluster solutions (Family-Only [FO], Borderline/Dysphoric [B/D], and Generally-Violent/Antisocial [GV/A]) were best-fitting across genders, with no ethnic differences. As hypothesized, FO, B/D, and GV/A subtypes had the lowest, intermediate, and highest rates of self-reported IPV and convictions, respectively. Typology group detected gender differences in predicted directions, mutual violence was the most common IPV type, and partners were most likely to have matching subtypes. <br><br>RESULTS support assessment at the individual dyadic level.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="1537-9418",
doi="10.1080/15379418.2015.1092911",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15379418.2015.1092911"
}