@article{ref1,
title="Validation of the Attention-Related Driving Errors Scale (ARDES) in an English-speaking sample",
journal="Human factors",
year="2016",
author="Barragán, Daniela and Roberts, Daniel M. and Baldwin, Carryl L.",
volume="58",
number="8",
pages="1262-1274",
abstract="OBJECTIVE: The goal for this study was to develop an English translation of the Attention-Related Driving Errors Scale (ARDES-US) and to determine its potential relationship with driver history and other demographic variables. <br><br>BACKGROUND: Individual differences in performance on vigilance and cognitive tasks are well documented, but less is known about susceptibility to attention-related errors while driving. The ARDES has been developed and administered in both Spanish and Chinese but to our knowledge has never been administered or examined in an English-speaking population. <br><br>METHOD: Two hundred ninety-six English-speaking individuals completed a series of self-report measures, including the ARDES-US, Attention-Related Cognitive Errors Scale, Mindful Attention Awareness Scale, and Cognitive Failures Questionnaire. <br><br>RESULTS: A confirmatory factor analysis using maximum-likelihood estimates with robust standard errors revealed results largely consistent with previous versions of the ARDES, namely, the ARDES-Spain and ARDES-Argentina. Additionally, a number of new results emerged. Specifically, women, drivers who received traffic tickets within the previous 2 years, and those with a lower level of education all had a greater propensity toward self-reported driver inattention as measured by the ARDES-US. Further analyses revealed that these findings were independent of age, years of driving experience, and driving frequency. <br><br>CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the ARDES-US is a valid and reliable measure of driver inattention with an English-speaking American sample. APPLICATION: Potential applications of the ARDES-US include identifying individuals who are at greater risk of attention-related errors while driving and suggesting individually tailored training and safety countermeasures.<br><br>© 2016, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="0018-7208",
doi="10.1177/0018720816657927",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720816657927"
}