@article{ref1,
title="On the prediction of pictorial comprehension",
journal="Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomic Society annual meeting",
year="2003",
author="Hicks, Kevin E. and Bell, Jennifer L. and Wogalter, Michael S.",
volume="47",
number="14",
pages="1735-1739",
abstract="Pictorial development and testing can be a costly and inefficient process. The process of designing and testing pictorial symbols could benefit from a precursor test to determine the likelihood that a concept will permit the design of a successful symbol (according to subsequent comprehension testing). This study examines whether ratings of the concepts of to-be-designed symbols could be useful in the prediction of comprehension of the ensuing symbols for those concepts. Participants rated 50 text descriptions (referent plus further verbal context) on: (1) how concrete is this concept? (2) how easy is it to visualize this concept?; and (3) how effective would a simple picture be in conveying this concept? These ratings served as predictors of the population estimates and open-ended comprehension scores obtained from previous research by Young and Wogalter (2001). <br><br>RESULTS showed that there was a high correlation between the measures used in this study with both population estimates and open-ended comprehension scores. Ease of visualization of a concept had the highest predictive value with concreteness, being the second highest predictor. Measures of the ease of visualization or imaging a concept may be useful preliminary tools for pictorial designers.<p /><p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="2169-5067",
doi="10.1177/154193120304701404",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154193120304701404"
}