@article{ref1,
title="What can the rules of evidence teach us about writing forensic reports?",
journal="Psychological injury and law",
year="2015",
author="Karson, Michael",
volume="8",
number="1",
pages="1-10",
abstract="The rules of evidence codify the legal system's evolved wisdom about fairness and validity. Especially on point are the rules pertaining to relevance (Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) 401), expert testimony (FRE 702), questioning witnesses (FRE 611), prejudice (FRE 403), hearsay (FRE 802), and character evidence (FRE 404). This paper assays to improve our reports and align them with the legal culture, regardless of whether this is needed to make our reports admissible, and to take advantage of what jurisprudence knows about weighing and presenting evidence. The paper reviews the most salient courtroom evidentiary rules, along with their associated courtroom objections, and discusses their implications for report writing. Understanding our legal system's treatment of evidence can improve our own.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="1938-971X",
doi="10.1007/s12207-015-9213-7",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12207-015-9213-7"
}