@article{ref1,
title="Efficacy of a peer-led, recovery-oriented shared decision-making system: a pilot randomized controlled trial",
journal="Psychiatric services",
year="2017",
author="Yamaguchi, Sosei and Taneda, Ayano and Matsunaga, Asami and Sasaki, Natsuki and Mizuno, Masashi and Sawada, Yumiko and Sakata, Masuhiro and Fukui, Satoe and Hisanaga, Fumie and Bernick, Peter and Ito, Junichiro",
volume="68",
number="12",
pages="1307-1311",
abstract="OBJECTIVE: The effects of a comprehensive shared decision-making system based on the CommonGround approach and incorporating peer support and a computerized decision aid were investigated. <br><br>METHODS: A pilot randomized controlled trial with six-month follow-up was conducted in Japan. Fifty-six outpatients with mental illness were randomly allocated to a shared decision-making system (intervention) group or treatment as usual (control) group. The implementation process and several outcomes were compared between groups. <br><br>RESULTS: The core components and processes of shared decision making were observed in the intervention group more frequently than in the control group. The intervention group also reported a significantly more positive participants' view of the relationship with their doctor than the control group. The intervention did not have a significant effect on most clinical and recovery-related outcomes. <br><br>CONCLUSIONS: The shared decision-making system appeared to partly improve patients' perceptions of communication and relationships with doctors but did not have a significant effect on other patient-level outcomes.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="1075-2730",
doi="10.1176/appi.ps.201600544",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201600544"
}