@article{ref1,
title="Concussion policy and law: primacy or subservience for the athletic trainer?",
journal="Athletic training and sports health care",
year="2017",
author="Ciccolella, Margaret E. and Ludwig, Chris and Ness, Mark Van and Sailor, Scott and Pond, Christopher",
volume="9",
number="4",
pages="149-153",
abstract="Legal mandates consistent with up-to-date scientific understanding are necessary for successful enforcement of concussion protocols. The health and safety of participants in both training and competition is ensured by the diligence of athletic trainers as their primary responsibility. Coaches must acquiesce to the health care provider's return-to-play recommendation because the coach's primary responsibility is coordination of play and training. This article provides a review of law and policy necessary for the enforcement of concussion protocols. A brief review of the history of concussions in sport is followed by a discussion of necessary legal mandates to support the primacy of the athletic trainer serving as a health care provider in determining the return-to-play status of a student-athlete with concussion. Legal mandates focus on emerging statutory law and the employment relationship of the athletic trainer and the school. The ultimate goal is protection of student-athletes from the medical consequences associated with concussions.   [Athletic Training & Sports Health Care. 2017;9(4):149-153.]<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="1942-5864",
doi="10.3928/19425864-20170504-04",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/19425864-20170504-04"
}