@article{ref1,
title="Hospital-based violence intervention programs targeting adult populations: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma evidence-based review",
journal="Trauma surgery and acute care open",
year="2016",
author="Affinati, Steven and Patton, Desmond and Hansen, Luke and Ranney, Megan and Christmas, A. Britton and Violano, Pina and Sodhi, Aparna and Robinson, Bryce and Crandall, Marie",
volume="1",
number="1",
pages="e000024-e000024",
abstract="BACKGROUND: Violent injury and reinjury take a devastating toll on distressed communities. Many trauma centers have created hospital-based violent injury prevention programs (HVIP) to address psychosocial, educational, and mental health needs of injured patients that may contribute to reinjury. <br><br>OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the overall effectiveness of HVIPs for violent injury prevention. We performed an evidence-based review to answer the following population, intervention, comparator, outcomes (PICO) question: Are HVIPs attending to adult patients (age 18+) treated for intentional injury more effective than the usual care at preventing: intentional violent reinjury and/or death; arrest and/or incarceration; substance abuse and/or mental issues; job and/or school attainment? DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library were queried for salient articles by a professional librarian on two separate occasions, and related articles were identified from references. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA PARTICIPANTS INTERVENTIONS: Eligible studies examined adult patients treated for intentional injury in a hospital-based violence prevention program compared to a control group. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology to assess the breadth and quality of the evidence. <br><br>RESULTS: 71 articles were identified. After discarding duplicates, reviews, and those articles that did not address our PICO questions, we ultimately reviewed 10 articles. We found insufficient evidence to recommend adult-focused HVIP interventions. LIMITATIONS: There was a relative paucity of data, and available studies were limited by self-selection bias and small sample sizes. <br><br>CONCLUSIONS: We make no recommendation with respect to adult-focused HVIP interventions.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="2397-5776",
doi="10.1136/tsaco-2016-000024",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2016-000024"
}