@article{ref1,
title="Evaluation of a tool to identify child sex trafficking victims in multiple healthcare settings",
journal="Journal of Adolescent Health",
year="2018",
author="Greenbaum, V. Jordan and Livings, Michelle S. and Lai, Betty S. and Edinburgh, Laurel and Baikie, Peggy and Grant, Sophia R. and Kondis, Jamie and Petska, Hillary W. and Bowman, Mary Jo and Legano, Lori and Kas-Osoka, Oriaku and Self-Brown, Shannon",
volume="63",
number="6",
pages="745-752",
abstract="PURPOSE: Estimate the prevalence of child sex trafficking (CST) among patients seeking care in multiple healthcare settings; evaluate a short screening tool to identify victims in a healthcare setting. <br><br>METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study involved patients from 16 sites throughout the U.S.: five pediatric emergency departments, six child advocacy centers, and five teen clinics. Participants included English-speaking youth ages 11-17years. For emergency department sites, inclusion criteria included a chief complaint of sexual violence. Data on several domains were gathered through self-report questionnaires and examiner interview. Main outcomes included prevalence of CST among eligible youth; sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive values, and positive/negative likelihood ratios for a CST screening tool. <br><br>RESULTS: Eight hundred and ten participants included 91 (11.52%) youth from emergency departments, 395 (48.8%) from child advocacy centers, and 324 (40.0%) from teen clinics. Overall prevalence of CST was 11.1%: 13.2% among emergency department patients, 6.3% among child advocacy center patients, and 16.4% among teen clinic patients, respectively. The screen had a sensitivity, specificity, and positive likelihood ratio of 84.44% (75.28, 91.23), 57.50% (53.80, 61.11), and 1.99% (1.76, 2.25), respectively. <br><br>CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a significant rate of CST among patients presenting to emergency departments (for sexual violence complaints), child advocacy centers, and teen clinics. A six-item screen showed relatively good sensitivity and moderate specificity. Negative predictive value was high. Intervention for a &quot;positive&quot; screen may identify victims and help prevent high-risk youth from becoming victimized. This is one of the first CST screening tools specifically developed and evaluated in the healthcare setting.<br><br>Copyright © 2018 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="1054-139X",
doi="10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.06.032",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.06.032"
}