@article{ref1,
title="The "warm zone" cases: environmental monitoring immediately outside the fire incident response arena by firefighters",
journal="Safety and health at work",
year="2018",
author="Caban-Martinez, Alberto J. and Kropa, Bob and Niemczyk, Neal and Moore, Kevin J. and Baum, Jeramy and Solle, Natasha Schaefer and Sterling, David A. and Kobetz, Erin N.",
volume="9",
number="3",
pages="352-355",
abstract="Hazardous work zones (i.e., <i>hot</i>, <i>warm</i>, and <i>cold</i>) are typically established by emergency response teams during hazardous materials (HAZMAT) calls but less consistently for fire responses to segment personnel and response activities in the immediate geographic area around the fire. Despite national guidelines, studies have documented the inconsistent use of respiratory protective equipment by firefighters at the fire scene. In this case-series report, we describe <i>warm</i> zone gas levels using multigas detectors across five independent fire incident responses all occurring in a large South Florida fire department. Multigas detector data collected at each fire response indicate the presence of sustained levels of volatile organic compounds in the &quot;warm zone&quot; of each fire event. These cases suggest that firefighters should not only implement strategies for multigas detector use within the <i>warm</i> zone but also include respiratory protection to provide adequate safety from toxic exposures in the <i>warm</i> zone.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="2093-7911",
doi="10.1016/j.shaw.2017.12.003",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2017.12.003"
}