
@article{ref1,
title="Achilles and the astronaut: what heroism humanities can teach heroism science",
journal="Journal of humanistic psychology",
year="2018",
author="Curry, Ruth Martin",
volume="58",
number="5",
pages="571-584",
abstract="In its ambition to become a &quot;transdisciplinary&quot; field of study, heroism science should leverage the expertise of the &quot;heroism humanities.&quot; This article uses humanistic knowledge to address one of the thorniest issues in the field: Who counts as a hero? After summarizing the &quot;subjective&quot; versus &quot;objective&quot; approach to defining heroism, I suggest the problem exists because we conflate two distinct conceptual categories: &quot;Heroes,&quot; or the ascription of heroic status to persons and &quot;heroism,&quot; or the ascription of heroic status to behavior. &quot;Hero,&quot; with deep roots in classical antiquity, generates a far more diverse web of associations than &quot;heroism,&quot; a modern construction. Using four examples from a recent news cycle of persons deemed &quot;heroes&quot; (a dictator, an astronaut, a victim of abuse, and an athlete), I demonstrate that a deeper appreciation of the Greek heroic tradition reveals that contemporary ascription of &quot;hero&quot; status is often a continuation, rather than a &quot;diminution&quot; of the word's historic meanings. Finally, I suggest that heroism science shift its focus from the study of heroic actors as natural objects to the study of how heroes function, discursively and symbolically, within their communities.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="0022-1678",
doi="10.1177/0022167817697797",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022167817697797"
}