@article{ref1,
title="More on the question 'When does absence of evidence constitute evidence of absence?' How Bayesian confirmation theory can logically support the answer",
journal="Forensic science international",
year="2019",
author="Taroni, F. and Bozza, S. and Hicks, T. and Garbolino, P.",
volume="301",
number="",
pages="e59-e63",
abstract="In forensic science it is not rare that common sayings are used to support particular inferences. A typical example is the adage 'The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence'. This paper analyzes the rationale hidden behind such statement and it offers a structural way to approach the analysis of this particular adage throughout a careful analysis of four different scenarios.<br><br>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="0379-0738",
doi="10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.05.044",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.05.044"
}