
@article{ref1,
title="Clinical epidemiological research on suicide-related behaviors-where we are and where we need to go",
journal="JAMA Psychiatry",
year="2019",
author="Kessler, Ronald C.",
volume="ePub",
number="ePub",
pages="ePub-ePub",
abstract="<p>Clinical epidemiological research on suicide-related behaviors (SRBs) is characterized by weak associations, weak effect sizes of clinical interventions, and strong effect sizes of some means-restriction interventions. These results have led several recent JAMA Psychiatry articles to conclude that nonclinical interventions must be central components in any successful multimodal SRB prevention strategy. I agree. But I disagree with the pessimism about components of this strategy in 2 of these recent articles: an editorial by Hoge about the low value of existing SRB-focused clinical trials and an article by Belsher et al about the low value of machine-learning (ML) methods ...</p> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="2168-622X",
doi="10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.1238",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.1238"
}