@article{ref1,
title="Risk assessment for antenatal depression among women who have undergone female genital mutilation or cutting: are we missing the mark?",
journal="Australian and New Zealand journal of obstetrics and gynaecology",
year="2019",
author="Boghossian, Araz S. and Freebody, John and Moses, Rebecca and Jenkins, Gregory",
volume="ePub",
number="ePub",
pages="ePub-ePub",
abstract="BACKGROUND: Although prohibited by specific legislation in Australia, patterns of global migration underscore the importance for local clinicians to recognise and manage potential complications associated with female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C). The incidence of antenatal depression in Australia is 10% and may be higher among those with a history of FGM/C (RANZCOG 2 statement: Perinatal Anxiety and Depression, 2012). The phenomenon of cultural embedding could represent a protective factor against an increase in mental health problems among these women. <br><br>AIM: To determine whether women who have undergone FGM/C are at greater risk of depression in the antenatal period as defined by the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). <br><br>MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicentre retrospective case-control study was performed. Participants who had delivered at either of two hospitals, had migrated from FGM/C-prevalent countries and who had undergone FGM/C were assessed and compared with the control group, case-matched by language and religion. <br><br>RESULTS: Eighty-nine cases were included with an equal number of matched controls. No significant difference in the EPDS score was demonstrated when analysed as a continuous variable (P = 0.41) or as a categorical variable with a cut-off score of 12 (P = 0.12). There was no difference in the number of women who identified as having thoughts of self-harm between the two groups. <br><br>CONCLUSION: There was no identified increase in the risk of antenatal depression among women who have undergone FGM/C from high-prevalence countries. Consideration must be given to the utility of the EPDS in this population, as well as factors such as cultural embedding.<br><br>© 2019 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="0004-8666",
doi="10.1111/ajo.13001",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13001"
}