@article{ref1,
title="A comparison of self-report and direct observation of booster seat use in Latino families",
journal="Injury prevention",
year="2010",
author="Quistberg, Duane Alexander and Lozano, Paula and Mack, Christopher D. and Schwartz, Rachel and Ebel, Beth E.",
volume="16",
number="4",
pages="225-229",
abstract="OBJECTIVE: To develop a reliable self-report tool for measuring child booster seat use among Latino families. <br><br>DESIGN: Cross-sectional and observational survey of a convenience sample. SETTING: Five retail stores in King County, Washington. PARTICIPANTS: 50 parents of children 4-8 years old that self-identified as Latino or Hispanic. MAIN EXPOSURES: Parent-reported measures of how often the child uses a booster seat, if the child used a booster seat on the last trip, how often the child complains about using a booster seat, how often the child asks to not use a booster seat, and how often other families they know use a booster seat. OUTCOME MEASURE: Observed booster seat use by child. <br><br>RESULTS: 26 children (52%) were observed using a booster seat. Parent-reported booster seat use was a poor predictor of observed booster seat use. Although 34 parents reported that their child 'always' uses a booster seat, 8 (24%) of these children were not using a booster seat. A logistic model to predict booster seat use had a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 71%, and misclassified 24% of the participants' observed use. <br><br>CONCLUSIONS: Reliance on parent-reported booster seat use significantly overstated observed booster seat use in the study. Among this study population, accurate determination of booster seat use required direct observation.<p /><p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="1353-8047",
doi="10.1136/ip.2009.025338",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ip.2009.025338"
}