@article{ref1,
title="Conflicting influences of justice motivations on moral judgments",
journal="Cognition and emotion",
year="2019",
author="Yoder, Keith J. and Decety, Jean",
volume="ePub",
number="ePub",
pages="ePub-ePub",
abstract="Humans are motivated by justice concerns, yet vary in their reactions to observing or experiencing injustice. At a proximate level, approach and avoidance represent core fundamental motivational systems which have been proposed to be involved in two independent moral systems: a prescriptive system responsive to obligations (<i>&quot;shoulds&quot;</i>) and a proscriptive system concerned with prohibitions (<i>&quot;should nots&quot;</i>). It is unclear whether these motivational systems or personal involvement better explain the influence of justice dispositions on moral judgments. To clarify this theoretical argument, two experiments examined how dispositional self-oriented and other-oriented justice sensitivity influence condemnation of prescriptive and proscriptive violations while manipulating perspective between-subject or within-subject. Participants rated the permissibility of everyday moral transgressions, from the perspective of the victim or a neutral observer. In Study 1 (<i>n</i> = 235), self-oriented dispositions increased and other-oriented dispositions decreased the probability of rating prescriptive violations as permissible. Study 2 (<i>n</i> = 468) replicated the effect of other-oriented justice sensitivity. Overall, these results bridge the gap between motivational systems and self-other processing. They suggest that justice sensitivity is better conceptualised as distinct motivations which can exert opposing influences on moral decision-making. Moreover, personal involvement may not be as important as individual justice motivations for explaining everyday moral decision-making.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="0269-9931",
doi="10.1080/02699931.2019.1669536",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2019.1669536"
}