@article{ref1,
title="Driving experiences of disabled drivers",
journal="Clinical rehabilitation",
year="2006",
author="Prasad, R. S. and Hunter, John A. and Hanley, James",
volume="20",
number="5",
pages="445-450",
abstract="OBJECTIVE: To study the influence of non-standard controls on return to driving after disability, including prevalence of accidents/retraining difficulties. DESIGN: Postal questionnaires sent within two years of assessment to 972 disabled drivers seen over a three-year period. SETTING: Scottish Driving Assessment Service. SUBJECTS: All patients considered capable of driving after assessment during the study period. RESULTS: Five hundred and eighty-nine people (61 %) replied who were representative of the total population (mean age 55 years, range 19-87); 73% were male and 70% were disabled for up to two years. Overall 79% respondents had returned to driving (highest reported success with standard manual car (86%) and lowest using left foot to accelerate and brake (66%) (chi2 = 16.6, P = 0.005)). A significantly higher proportion of the 30 patients (6.5%) admitting to accidents and 25 (5.4%) to problems with retraining were using non-standard driving techniques, especially the use of hand controls. CONCLUSION: Disabled drivers returning to drive using non-familiar controls had lower success and a higher proportion of accidents and/or problems with retraining than people using conventional controls. If confirmed in larger studies this may have implications for policy-makers as well as specialist practitioners.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="0269-2155",
doi="",
url="http://dx.doi.org/"
}