@article{ref1,
title="Max Weber's 'inconvenient facts' and contemporary studies of public science communication",
journal="Social epistemology",
year="2020",
author="Shipovalova, Lada",
volume="34",
number="2",
pages="130-141",
abstract="In his text 'Wissenschaft als Beruf', Max Weber associates the understanding of science as a vocation with the scientist's ability to present the audience with 'inconvenient facts'. He argues that this presentation provides a 'full understanding of the facts' and overcomes any personal value judgment. This overcoming refers to Weber's understanding of scientific objectivity. I propose to interpret this understanding in the context of contemporary studies of public science communication. I pose the question, 'Should scientists objectively present inconvenient facts to the public or should they neglect objectivity in science-society communication?' I will start by legitimizing this question in the context of contemporary discussions on public science communication. To answer this question I will then use Heather Douglas's observations addressing irreducible complexity of objectivity as a conceptual framework. I will briefly describe, with some modifications, this idea in relation to Weber's representation of 'inconvenient facts'. I then will continue by referencing discussions concerning scientist's norms in public science communication and relate them to the formulations of objectivity above. In conclusion, I will offer an explanation of why the objectivity in Weber's interpretation remains relevant to regulate contemporary public science communication.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="0269-1728",
doi="10.1080/02691728.2019.1695013",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2019.1695013"
}