@article{ref1,
title="Localizing modality compatibility effects: evidence from dual-task interference",
journal="Journal of experimental psychology: human perception and performance",
year="2020",
author="Wirth, Robert and Koch, Iring and Kunde, Wilfried",
volume="ePub",
number="ePub",
pages="ePub-ePub",
abstract="Performance is typically superior with modality-compatible stimulus-response sets (e.g., responding vocally to auditory stimuli and manually to visual stimuli) than with modality-incompatible sets (e.g., responding vocally to visual stimuli and manually to auditory stimuli). Here we studied the information-processing stage at which these modality compatibility effects arise. In three experiments using a dual-task setup, we demonstrated that these compatibility effects arose (at least partly) prior to a capacity-limited central stage that is commonly believed to be the origin of dual-task costs. We suggest that demands to employ a specific effector system bias perceptual processing toward effector-compatible stimulus modalities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="0096-1523",
doi="10.1037/xhp0000873",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000873"
}