@article{ref1,
title="Cost-effectiveness of screening for osteoporosis in older men with a history of  falls",
journal="JAMA network open",
year="2020",
author="Ito, Kouta",
volume="3",
number="12",
pages="e2027584-e2027584",
abstract="IMPORTANCE: Falls and osteoporosis share the potential clinical end point of  fractures among older patients. To date, few fall prevention guidelines incorporate  screening for osteoporosis to reduce fall-related fractures. <br><br>OBJECTIVE: To assess  the cost-effectiveness of screening for osteoporosis using dual-energy x-ray  absorptiometry (DXA) followed by osteoporosis treatment in older men with a history  of falls. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this economic evaluation, a Markov  model was developed to simulate the incidence of major osteoporotic fractures in a  hypothetical cohort of community-dwelling men aged 65 years who had fallen at least  once in the past year. Data sources included literature published from January 1,  1946, to July 31, 2020. The model adopted a societal perspective, a lifetime  horizon, a 1-year cycle length, and a discount rate of 3% per year for both health  benefits and costs. The analysis was designed and conducted from October 1, 2019, to  September 30, 2020. INTERVENTIONS: Screening with DXA followed by treatment for men  diagnosed with osteoporosis compared with usual care. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES:  Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), measured by cost per quality-adjusted  life-year (QALY) gained. <br><br>RESULTS: Among the hypothetical cohort of men aged 65  years, the screening strategy had an ICER of $33 169/QALY gained and was preferred  over usual care at the willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000/QALY gained. The  number needed to screen to prevent 1 hip fracture was 1876; to prevent 1 major  osteoporotic fracture, 746. The screening strategy would become more effective and  less costly than usual care for men 77 years and older. The ICER for the screening  strategy did not substantially change across a wide range of assumptions tested in  all other deterministic sensitivity analyses. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of  $50 000/QALY gained, screening was cost-effective in 56.0% of simulations; at  $100 000/QALY gained, 90.8% of simulations; and at $200 000/QALY gained, 99.6% of  simulations. <br><br>CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that for older men  who have fallen at least once in the past year, screening with DXA followed by  treatment for those diagnosed with osteoporosis is a cost-effective use of  resources. Fall history could be a useful cue to trigger assessment for osteoporosis  in men.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="2574-3805",
doi="10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.27584",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.27584"
}