@article{ref1,
title="Ability of the Brief-Balance Evaluation Systems Test to evaluate balance deficits in community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional study",
journal="Physiotherapy theory and practice",
year="2020",
author="Shinohara, Tomoyuki and Saida, Kosuke and Miyata, Kazuhiro",
volume="ePub",
number="ePub",
pages="ePub-ePub",
abstract="BACKGROUND: A method for assessing balance that differentiates between balance deficit can help guide effective interventions for preventing falls in older adults.   OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to clarify the relationship between balance control systems and falls, and to examine the ability of the Brief-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) to evaluate balance deficits in older adults.   METHODS: Overall, 109 community-dwelling older adults participated in this study. The history of falls in the last year was investigated. Balance deficits were assessed using the Brief-BESTest, the functional reach test, the Timed up and Go Test, and the one leg balance test. We analyzed the difference between the fallers and non-fallers across two different age groups.   RESULTS: Among younger-older group participants (age < 75 years), there were no significant differences between fallers and non-fallers across all variables. Among older-older group participants (age ≥ 75 years), there were significant differences in the Brief-BESTest total (p= .011; fallers, 13.5 versus non-fallers, 17.0) and section IV scores (postural responses of the Brief-BESTest; p= .026, 2.0 versus 5.0). There was no significant difference in other balance measurements.   CONCLUSIONS: The postural responses assessed by the Brief-BESTest may serve important functions and may be associated with falls in older adults.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="0959-3985",
doi="10.1080/09593985.2020.1840682",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2020.1840682"
}