@article{ref1,
title="Evaluating driver eye glance behavior and secondary task engagement while using driving automation systems",
journal="Accident analysis and prevention",
year="2020",
author="Noble, Alexandria M. and Miles, Melissa and Perez, Miguel A. and Guo, Feng and Klauer, Sheila G.",
volume="151",
number="",
pages="e105959-e105959",
abstract="Partial driving automation systems are designed to assist drivers in some vehicle operation demands. However, modifications to the driving task that change the  driver's role from that of an active participant to a passive supervisor could  result in insufficient monitoring of the driving automation system and the  surrounding environment. A reduced subset of driving data for 19 drivers from the  Virginia Connected Corridors 50 Elite Naturalistic Driving Study was used to assess  whether driver eye glance behavior and secondary task engagement were different when  driver assistance systems were active compared to when they were available but  inactive (n = 148). The results of this study demonstrate that drivers spent more  time looking away from the road while driving automation systems were active and  that drivers were more likely to be observed browsing on their cell phones while  using driving automation systems. Current driving automation features require human  monitoring of automation, yet the drivers of these automation-equipped vehicles are  inclined to engage in secondary tasks and take longer and more frequent glances away  from the roadway. It is possible that performance effects, such as omission errors  or delayed reactions, may occur as a result of drivers' substandard monitoring of  the driving scene.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="0001-4575",
doi="10.1016/j.aap.2020.105959",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105959"
}