@article{ref1,
title="Is physical alteration a sufficient reason to prohibit ritual infant circumcision?",
journal="Journal of religion and health",
year="2021",
author="Jacobs, Allan J.",
volume="ePub",
number="ePub",
pages="ePub-ePub",
abstract="European culture and thought have long disfavored ritual child circumcision, which is obligatory to Jews and Muslims. Much opposition to this practice hinges on the  notion that it represents an unwarranted unconsented physical assault on the child. This article takes issue with that conclusion. Furthermore, even if one were to  grant this conclusion, the offense is not of sufficient magnitude to warrant  government action to halt the practice. On the other hand, suppression of ritual  child circumcision may represent an attack against cultures and societies in which  circumcision is practiced.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="0022-4197",
doi="10.1007/s10943-020-01139-9",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10943-020-01139-9"
}