@article{ref1,
title="Homicide by unspecified means: Cleveland 2008 to 2019",
journal="American journal of forensic medicine and pathology",
year="2021",
author="Krywanczyk, Alison and Gilson, Thomas",
volume="ePub",
number="ePub",
pages="ePub-ePub",
abstract="The diagnosis homicide by unspecified means (HUM) is used to categorize deaths occurring under suspicious or criminal circumstances, but a specific cause of death cannot be identified. In 2010, Matshes and Lew (Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2010;31(2):174-177) presented a HUM cases series, from which they derived 5 diagnostic criteria; however, the accuracy of these criteria has not been assessed.To identify a validation cohort, Cuyahoga County Medical Examiner's Office records were searched from 2008 to 2019 for cases certified as HUM. Thirteen cases were identified; on review, all cases fulfilled criteria 1, 4, and 5. Only 1 case had a potential anatomic cause of death identified (criterion 2).However, in 3 cases, toxicologic analyses could not be conducted because of skeletonization; in 2 cases, the decedents tested positive for cocaine/benzoylecgonine but were found in proximity to other victims for whom a specific violent cause of death was determined. By strict reading of criterion 3, these cases would have been excluded from the diagnosis of HUM. Perpetrators confessed to homicide in 7 cases, including the 5 cases that failed the toxicologic criterion. The 2010 diagnostic criteria are a reasonable foundation for the determination of HUM; modification of criterion 3 would provide improved flexibility based on clinical judgment.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="0195-7910",
doi="10.1097/PAF.0000000000000657",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PAF.0000000000000657"
}