@article{ref1,
title="Bystander responses to bias-based bullying and retaliation: is retaliation perceived as more acceptable than bias-based bullying?",
journal="British journal of developmental psychology",
year="2021",
author="Gönültaş, Seçil and Mulvey, Kelly Lynn",
volume="ePub",
number="ePub",
pages="ePub-ePub",
abstract="The current study examined intergroup-related and social-cognitive correlates of bystanders' acceptability judgements and their responses to bias-based bullying of immigrant peers and to possible retaliation for the bullying. Participants included 179 immigrant-origin and non-immigrant-origin youth (M(age)  = 13.23; SD = 1.55; 79 immigrant-origin youth). Participants' bystander judgements and responses to bullying and retaliation were examined via a hypothetical scenario. Further, participants' intergroup attitudes towards immigrants and their social-cognitive skills were evaluated. ANOVA results showed that immigrant-origin youth judged bullying as less acceptable and retaliation as more acceptable compared to non-immigrant-origin youth, documenting that group membership is related to adolescents' judgements. A similar pattern was observed in active bystander responses. Hierarchical regression analyses revealed that immigration background, intergroup process in the context of immigration, and social-cognitive skills predict bystander responses to bullying and retaliation. This study provides important implications for anti-bullying intervention programmes to overcome the negative consequences of retaliation in the escalation of aggressive behaviours.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="0261-510X",
doi="10.1111/bjdp.12371",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12371"
}