@article{ref1,
title="Affordability and availability of child restraints in under-served populations in South Africa [conference abstract]",
journal="Injury prevention",
year="2021",
author="Puvanachandra, Prasanthi and Janmohammed, Aliasgher and Mtambeka, Pumla and Prinsloo, Megan and As, Sebastian Van and Peden, Margaret Mary",
volume="27",
number="Suppl 2",
pages="A1 1A.003-A1 1A.003",
abstract="Virtual Pre-Conference Global Injury Prevention Showcase 2021 - Abstract Book - # 1A.003  Background Child road traffic injuries are a major global public health problem and the issue is particularly burdensome in middle-income countries such as South Africa (SA) where injury death rates are 41 per 100 000 for under 5's and 24.5 per 100 000 for 5-14-year-olds. Despite their known effectiveness in reducing injuries amongst children, and a recently amended law, the rate of child restraint systems (CRS) usage remains low in SA and little is known about barriers and facilitating factors.   Methods We carried out observation studies and parent/carer surveys in 6 suburbs of Cape Town over three months to assess usage rates and explore knowledge and perceptions of parents towards CRS legislation, ownership and cost.   Results Only 7.8% of child passengers were observed to be properly restrained in a CRS with driver seatbelt use and single child occupancy being associated with higher child restraint use. 92% of survey respondents claimed to have knowledge of current child restraint legislation, however, only 32% of those parents/carers were able to correctly identify the age requirements and penalty. Reasons for not owning a child seat included high cost and the belief that seatbelts were a suitable alternative.   Conclusions These findings indicate the need for tighter legislation with an increased fine paired with enhanced enforcement of both adult seatbelt and child restraint use. The provision of low-cost/subsidised CRS or borrowing schemes and targeted social marketing through online fora, well baby clinics, early learning centres would be beneficial in increasing ownership and use of CRS.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="1353-8047",
doi="10.1136/injuryprev-2021-safety.3",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2021-safety.3"
}