@article{ref1,
title="How can we demonstrate the public value of evidence-based policy making when government ministers declare that the people 'have had enough of experts'?",
journal="Palgrave communications",
year="2017",
author="Andrews, Leighton",
volume="3",
number="1",
pages="1-9",
abstract="Recent political campaigns on both sides of the Atlantic have led some to argue that we live in the age of 'post-factual' or 'post-truth' politics, suggesting evidence has a limited role in debate and public policy. How can we demonstrate the public value of evidence-informed debate under those circumstances? Survey evidence on public attitudes to expertise offers some hope that the tone of much of this debate is unduly pessimistic. While policy-making always develops in an environment where evidence is contested, this paper will argue that understanding of the routines through which Ministers work and assimilate evidence is actually under-researched. Not only are Ministers open to evidence, but there is an institutional grounding for evidence-based policy in government. Meanwhile, the creation of devolved institutions has created new sites in the UK for evidence-based policy-making, despite the political tensions between UK and devolved governments. Drawing on academic and think tank insights, and experience as a Welsh Government Minister between 2007 and 2016, this paper argues for three key approaches for the academic community to adopt: understanding the temporal focus of ministers, building trust amongst ministers and those who advise them in the evidence-promoting capacity of the academic policy community, and shaping the wider authorising environment, including the media that contributes to the framing of key policy debates.<p /><p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="2055-1045",
doi="10.1057/s41599-017-0013-4",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41599-017-0013-4"
}