@article{ref1,
title="Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of universal school-based mindfulness training compared with normal school provision in reducing risk of mental health problems and promoting well-being in adolescence: the MYRIAD cluster randomised controlled trial",
journal="Evidence-based mental health",
year="2022",
author="Kuyken, Willem and Ball, Susan and Crane, Catherine and Ganguli, Poushali and Jones, Benjamin and Montero-Marín, Jesus and Nuthall, Elizabeth and Raja, Anam and Taylor, Laura and Tudor, Kate and Viner, Russell M. and Allwood, Matthew and Aukland, Louise and Dunning, Darren and Casey, Tríona and Dalrymple, Nicola and Wilde, Katherine De and Farley, Eleanor-Rose and Harper, Jennifer and Kappelmann, Nils and Kempnich, Maria and Lord, Liz and Medlicott, Emma and Palmer, Lucy and Petit, Ariane and Philips, Alice and Pryor-Nitsch, Isobel and Radley, Lucy and Sonley, Anna and Shackleford, Jem and Tickell, Alice and Blakemore, Sarah-Jayne and Team, The MYRIAD and Ukoumunne, Obioha C. and Greenberg, Mark T. and Ford, Tamsin and Dalgleish, Tim and Byford, Sarah and Williams, J. Mark G.",
volume="ePub",
number="ePub",
pages="ePub-ePub",
abstract="Background Systematic reviews suggest school-based mindfulness training (SBMT) shows promise in promoting student mental health.  Objective The My Resilience in Adolescence (MYRIAD) Trial evaluated the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of SBMT compared with teaching-as-usual (TAU).  Methods MYRIAD was a parallel group, cluster-randomised controlled trial. Eighty-five eligible schools consented and were randomised 1:1 to TAU (43 schools, 4232 students) or SBMT (42 schools, 4144 students), stratified by school size, quality, type, deprivation and region. Schools and students (mean (SD); age range=12.2 (0.6); 11-14 years) were broadly UK population-representative. Forty-three schools (n=3678 pupils; 86.9%) delivering SBMT, and 41 schools (n=3572; 86.2%) delivering TAU, provided primary end-point data. SBMT comprised 10 lessons of psychoeducation and mindfulness practices. TAU comprised standard social-emotional teaching. Participant-level risk for depression, social-emotional-behavioural functioning and well-being at 1 year follow-up were the co-primary outcomes. Secondary and economic outcomes were included.  Findings Analysis of 84 schools (n=8376 participants) found no evidence that SBMT was superior to TAU at 1 year. Standardised mean differences (intervention minus control) were: 0.005 (95% CI −0.05 to 0.06) for risk for depression; 0.02 (−0.02 to 0.07) for social-emotional-behavioural functioning; and 0.02 (−0.03 to 0.07) for well-being. SBMT had a high probability of cost-effectiveness (83%) at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20 000 per quality-adjusted life year. No intervention-related adverse events were observed.  Conclusions Findings do not support the superiority of SBMT over TAU in promoting mental health in adolescence.  Clinical implications There is need to ask what works, for whom and how, as well as considering key contextual and implementation factors.  Trial registration Current controlled trials ISRCTN86619085. This research was funded by the Wellcome Trust (WT104908/Z/14/Z and WT107496/Z/15/Z).<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="1362-0347",
doi="10.1136/ebmental-2021-300396",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2021-300396"
}