@article{ref1,
title="Clinical tests predicting on-road performance in older drivers with cognitive impairment",
journal="Canadian journal of occupational therapy",
year="2022",
author="Krasniuk, Sarah and Crizzle, Alexander M. and Toxopeus, Ryan and Mychael, Diane and Prince, Natasha",
volume="ePub",
number="ePub",
pages="ePub-ePub",
abstract="Background. The Trail Making Test Part B (Trails B) and Useful Field of View® (UFOV) can predict on-road outcomes in drivers with cognitive impairment (CI); however, studies have not included drivers referred for comprehensive driving evaluations (CDEs), who typically have more severe CI. <br><br>PURPOSE. We determined the predictive ability of Trails B and UFOV on pass/fail on-road outcomes in drivers with CI (Montreal Cognitive Assessment <26) referred for CDEs. <br><br>METHOD. Retrospective data collection from two driving assessments centers (N  =  100, mean age  =  76.2  ±  8.8 years). <br><br>FINDINGS. The Trails B (area under the curve [AUC]  =  .70) and UFOV subtests 2 (AUC  =  .73) and 3 (AUC  =  .76) predicted pass/fail outcomes. A cut-point ≥467 ms on UFOV subtest 3 better-predicted pass/fail outcomes with 78.9% sensitivity and 73.5% specificity. In comparison, a cut-point ≥3.58 min on Trails B had lower sensitivity (73.7%) and specificity (61.8%). Implications. The UFOV subtest 3 may be more useful than the Trails B for predicting pass/fail outcomes in drivers with more severe CI referred for CDEs.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="0008-4174",
doi="10.1177/00084174221117708",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00084174221117708"
}