@article{ref1,
title="Rehabilitation for torture survivors: six evidence myths and their implications for future research",
journal="Torture: quarterly journal on rehabilitation of torture victims and prevention of torture",
year="2022",
author="Patel, Nimisha and Williams, Amanda",
volume="32",
number="1/2",
pages="227-250",
abstract="Whilst it is established that torture survivors suffer from complex, multiple and often severe and enduring physical, psychological, social, welfare and many other difficulties; and that rehabilitation as reparation should be holistic, interdisciplinary and specialist, majority of the research on rehabilitation focuses increasingly and almost exclusively on psychological interventions. Further, as-sumptions that this research provides evidence of which are effective psychological interventions may underpin and skew ser-vices funded and provided to torture survivors. In this paper we challenge some of those assumptions, and discuss the concep-tual, theoretical, epistemological and methodological limitations of this research and implications for future research.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="1018-8185",
doi="10.7146/torture.v32i1-2.131776",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.7146/torture.v32i1-2.131776"
}