@article{ref1,
title="Correction to: Intervention characteristics associated with a reduction in fear of falling among community-dwelling older people. a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs",
journal="Gerontologist",
year="2022",
author="The editors, ",
volume="ePub",
number="ePub",
pages="ePub-ePub",
abstract="This is a correction to: Marlot Kruisbrink, MSc, Kim Delbaere, PhD, Gertrudis I J M Kempen, PhD, Rik Crutzen, PhD, Ton Ambergen, PhD, Kei-Long Cheung, PhD, Denise Kendrick, DM, Steve Iliffe, FRCGP, G A Rixt Zijlstra, PhD, Intervention Characteristics Associated With a Reduction in Fear of Falling Among Community-Dwelling Older People: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials, The Gerontologist, Volume 61, Issue 6, September 2021, Pages e269-e282, https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaa021  In this study, a meta-regression was performed with the standardized mean difference (SMD) as the dependent variable. The regression coefficient (B) represents the difference in the SMD between interventions with and without a certain intervention characteristic. Unfortunately, the abstract and results section mentions &quot;SMD&quot; several times, instead of &quot;B&quot; for regression coefficient. Due to this error, readers may misinterpret the methodology and the findings.   All instances in the abstract which mention &quot;SMD:&quot; should be &quot;B:&quot;. In the meta-regression section of the results, all instances which mention &quot;SMD&quot; between the parentheses, should be &quot;B&quot;. In addition, in the meta-regression section the following errors occurred:   &quot;Only holistic exercise (i.e., tai chi, yoga, ving tsun, or Pilates) yielded a significant association with the SMD of −0.823 (95% CI: −1.255; −0.392, p <.001). &quot; Should be &quot;Only holistic exercise (i.e., tai chi, yoga, ving tsun, or Pilates) yielded a significant association with the SMD. B was −0.823 (95% CI: −1.255; −0.392, p <.001). &quot;   &quot;Delivery in a community setting was significantly associated with a SMD of −0.528 (95% CI: −0.894; −0.161, p =.006; Table 1)…&quot; Should be &quot;Delivery in a community setting was significantly associated with the SMD. B was −0.528 (95% CI: −0.894; −0.161, p =.006; Table 1)…&quot;   &quot;However, supervision by a tai chi instructor was significantly associated with a SMD&quot; of −1.047 (95% CI: −1.598; −0.496, p <.001),…&quot; Should be &quot; However, supervision by a tai chi instructor was significantly associated with the SMD. B was −1.047 (95% CI: −1.598;−0.496, p <.001)…&quot;  These details have been corrected only in this correction notice to preserve the published version of record.   [A notice reflecting this unusual editorial decision has been placed with the original article in the SafetyLit database.]<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="0016-9013",
doi="10.1093/geront/gnac131",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnac131"
}