@article{ref1,
title="Rethinking vision and action",
journal="Annual review of psychology",
year="2023",
author="Nakayama, Ken and Moher, Jeff and Song, Joo-Hyun",
volume="74",
number="",
pages="59-86",
abstract="Action is an important arbitrator as to whether an individual or a species will survive. Yet, action has not been well integrated into the study of psychology. Action or motor behavior is a field apart. This is traditional science with its need for specialization. The sequence in a typical laboratory experiment of see → decide → act provides the rationale for broad disciplinary categorizations. With renewed interest in action itself, surprising and exciting anomalous findings at odds with this simplified caricature have emerged. They reveal a much more intimate coupling of vision and action, which we describe. In turn, this prompts us to identify and dwell on three pertinent theories deserving of greater notice.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="0066-4308",
doi="10.1146/annurev-psych-021422-043229",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-021422-043229"
}