@article{ref1,
title="Robust tension over safety",
journal="Review of politics",
year="2000",
author="Cochran, Clarke E.",
volume="62",
number="1",
pages="39-42",
abstract="Gary D. Glenn and John Stack advance two important claims; one explicit, the other implicit. Their explicit claim is that the &quot;new regime of civil liberties&quot; is dangerous to Catholicism. Here I am in qualified agreement, though important ambiguities cloud the argument. Their implicit claim is that it is a bad thing for Catholicism to be in danger. This proposition is flawed. Glenn and Stack cite (without irony) American Catholics &quot;who have spent several generations seeking to become accepted and acceptable to the American democratic culture.&quot; A large part of the danger seems to be &quot;the punishment of exclusion from respectability in the culture.&quot; This assumes that the &quot;normal&quot; mode for Catholicism is comfortable accommodation to political culture and institutions.<p /><p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="0034-6705",
doi="10.1017/S0034670500030229",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500030229"
}