@article{ref1,
title="Queries as to rhus and other poisonings",
journal="The Homoeopathic physician",
year="1888",
author="Hooker, Frederick",
volume="8",
number="7",
pages="384-385",
abstract="Editor Homceopathic Physician: In replying to Dr. Farley's letter, in the June number of The Homceopathic Physician, I wish to ask the Doctor a few questions.   First.--Is the disappearance of the immediate symptoms a sign of cure ?  Second.--If so, why do the symptoms recur, in many in stances at the same time every year, without a fresh exposure ?  Dr. Seward cited a case of eighteen years' standing.   Third.--If Dr. F. was cured, why is he still so extremely susceptible to the poison ?  Fourth.--Does the Doctor deny that the poison may be carried to the face and genital organs by the unwashed hands; as well as by systemic infection?  If Rhus tox. C. M. or D. M. or any other high potency will cure a case of &quot;Rhus poisoning,&quot; why will not a high potency of Crotalus cure the poisonous effects of the rattlesnake bite, a high potency of Arsenic or Strychnia cases of poisoning by these respective drugs, and so on &quot;ad finem &quot;?  Is it possible that the cases above mentioned are not analo gous, even under the guidance of the isopathic law ?<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="",
doi="",
url="http://dx.doi.org/"
}