@article{ref1,
title="The crisis of right to informational self-determination versus the crisis of social safety",
journal="Journal of safety and crisis management",
year="2023",
author="Crisis and Emergency Management: Theory and Praxis,  and Cha, Dongwook",
volume="13",
number="2",
pages="45-52",
abstract="The control of information about oneself has emerged as the most sensitive issue both personally and nationally in a digital information society. In the digital information society, the right to informational self-determination is very likely to emerge as a fundamental constitutional right to be the cornerstone of maintaining a free democratic system. As a guardian of constitutional rights, the Korean Constitutional Court has maintained an appropriate balance between guaranteeing the right to informational self-determination and social safety. This paper examines how the Constitutional Court allows restrictions on the right to informational self-determination by analyzing the details of the four-step review of the principle of prohibition of excessive restriction on cases of violation of the right to informational self-determination. Even if some flaws are often found in the process of the argumentation, the Constitutional Court's credit for properly balancing the right to informational self-determination and social safety as public interest should not be underestimated.<p /> <p>Language: ko</p>",
language="ko",
issn="2671-5732",
doi="10.14251/jscm.2023.2.45",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.14251/jscm.2023.2.45"
}