@article{ref1,
title="Static-99R norms and cross-cultural validity for Australian Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal men convicted of sexual offences",
journal="Sexual abuse: a journal of research and treatment",
year="2023",
author="Howard, Mark V. A. and Chong, Chee Seng and Murphy, Kristy",
volume="ePub",
number="ePub",
pages="ePub-ePub",
abstract="This study examined Static-99R normative data and cross-cultural validity in a sample of 811 Aboriginal and 3257 non-Aboriginal Australian men (N = 4068) serving custodial orders for sexual offences in New South Wales (NSW), Australia. Aboriginal men scored significantly higher on the Static-99R than non-Aboriginal men (M = 4.39 vs. 2.61) and were more likely to be represented in higher categories of risk. The Static-99R showed good discrimination performance for the total sample (AUC =.76; 95% CI = [.73-.80]) and acceptable calibration to expected reoffending rates for routine samples, with slight tendencies towards overestimation. Discrimination accuracy was lower for Aboriginal men (AUC =.68; 95% CI = [.60-77]) than non-Aboriginal men (AUC =.78; 95% CI = [.74-83]) although was significantly better than chance for both groups. Additional analyses indicated that cross-cultural differences in discrimination were partly associated with variance in sample composition between groups. This is the first Australian study to find evidence for significant predictive validity of the Static-99R with Aboriginal men, and while further research is needed, the results provide initial support for cross-cultural applications of the measure in local criminal justice settings.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="1079-0632",
doi="10.1177/10790632231219233",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10790632231219233"
}