@article{ref1,
title="Behavioral compliance with safety signs and labels: an analysis of research methods from the past 25 years",
journal="Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomic Society annual meeting",
year="2023",
author="Diebol, Julia K. and LoVoi, Kelly and Coelho, Chason J.",
volume="67",
number="1",
pages="1031-1037",
abstract="This paper reviews research published from 1998 to 2022 that involved collection of original data related to behavioral compliance with safety signs and labels. This review provides a needed update to previous similar reviews using a published taxonomical approach. The approach was used here to categorize study methodology and was extended to further categorize studies by whether they addressed behavioral compliance or intention/predicted likelihood of compliance. Nearly all of the studies reviewed assessed behavior in laboratories or via surveys of hypothetical scenarios, and relatively few used real-world experimental or real-world observational methods. <br><br>RESULTS revealed a lack of empirical demonstrations that intention and predicted likelihood of compliance are reliable predictors of real-world behavioral compliance. There was also a notable lack of evidence that warnings design aspects impact such real-world compliance.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="2169-5067",
doi="10.1177/21695067231192259",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21695067231192259"
}